DISQUS

Anonymous · 1 year ago

[...] Original post by KerryG [...]
Anonymous · 1 year ago

Why no USM? Bummer.
kais · 1 year ago

Why no USM? Bummer.
Anonymous · 1 year ago

Its a good way to save money I guess.
kgarrison · 1 year ago

Its a good way to save money I guess.
Anonymous · 1 year ago

This looks really interesting, but I'm concerned about what the image quality will be like. I keep reading bad reviews of the EF-S 17-85, and I can't imagine that this lens will be better.
Anonymous · 1 year ago

bad reviews of the EF-S 17-85? I use that lens to shoot most of the weddings I do and get excellent results. This new lens has even better image stabilization and since it is f/3..5 - f5.6 versus the 17-85 which is f/4 - f/5.6 it will allow you to shoot in much darker settings than the 17-85 will.
Bryan · 1 year ago

This looks really interesting, but I'm concerned about what the image quality will be like. I keep reading bad reviews of the EF-S 17-85, and I can't imagine that this lens will be better.
kgarrison · 1 year ago

bad reviews of the EF-S 17-85? I use that lens to shoot most of the weddings I do and get excellent results. This new lens has even better image stabilization and since it is f/3..5 - f5.6 versus the 17-85 which is f/4 - f/5.6 it will allow you to shoot in much darker settings than the 17-85 will.