<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Camera Dojo - Latest Comments in Using your flash’s guide number</title><link>http://cameradojo.disqus.com/</link><description>Helping you make the most out of your photography</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:53:36 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Using your flash’s guide number</title><link>http://cameradojo.com/2008/07/19/using-your-flash%e2%80%99s-guide-number/#comment-2416747</link><description>Sorry, I understand... it's the metter's convertion ( :</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pierre</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:53:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Using your flash’s guide number</title><link>http://cameradojo.com/2008/07/19/using-your-flash%e2%80%99s-guide-number/#comment-2416686</link><description>Hello, &lt;br&gt;Thank you for this tutorial. &lt;br&gt;But there is something that I do not understand. &lt;br&gt;With a Canon 580exII, I have to use 190 or 58 NG in the Calculation Spreadsheet? &lt;br&gt;I do not understand the 190 number if the number of guide 580exII is 58? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you for your reply (I don't speak English very well)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pierre</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:46:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Using your flash’s guide number</title><link>http://cameradojo.com/2008/07/19/using-your-flash%e2%80%99s-guide-number/#comment-1999557</link><description>Kerry,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm gonna call you out again.  ISO multipliers follow the inverse square law, just like apertures, so the table should read:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;100 - 1.0&lt;br&gt;200 - 1.4&lt;br&gt;400 - 2.0&lt;br&gt;800 - 2.8&lt;br&gt;1600 - 4.0&lt;br&gt;3200 - 5.6&lt;br&gt;6400 - 8.0&lt;br&gt;12800 - 11.0 (Only for D3 owners...)&lt;br&gt;25600 - 16.0&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Seems much easier to remember, since that same scale is written on my lens and programmed into my camera, and it's correct!  Of course, it's not exact, ISO 200's multiplier should really be 1.41421356... but it's close enough.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;Tyler</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tyler G. Hicks-Wright</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 04:12:59 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>